DyerPay vs Traditional Platforms
See how DyerPay compares to traditional municipal payment platforms like Tyler, nCourt, GovPay, and others
Contract Required
DyerPay
No
Traditional Platforms
Typically
Monthly Fees
DyerPay
None
Traditional Platforms
Often
Setup Fees
DyerPay
None
Traditional Platforms
Often
Per-Transaction Pricing
DyerPay
Flat & transparent
Traditional Platforms
Varies
Funds Flow
DyerPay
Direct to agency
Traditional Platforms
Often pass-through
Data Ownership
DyerPay
Agency retains full control
Traditional Platforms
Platform-dependent
CSV Import/Export
DyerPay
First-class feature
Traditional Platforms
Limited or fixed
API Access
DyerPay
Included
Traditional Platforms
Add-on or restricted
Vendor Lock-In
DyerPay
None
Traditional Platforms
Common
Ideal Use Case
DyerPay Lightweight, flexible integration
Traditional Platforms Full system replacement
| Feature | DyerPay | Traditional Platforms (Tyler, nCourt, GovPay, etc.) |
|---|---|---|
| Contract Required | No | Typically |
| Monthly Fees | None | Often |
| Setup Fees | None | Often |
| Per-Transaction Pricing | Flat & transparent | Varies |
| Funds Flow | Direct to agency | Often pass-through |
| Data Ownership | Agency retains full control | Platform-dependent |
| CSV Import/Export | First-class feature | Limited or fixed |
| API Access | Included | Add-on or restricted |
| Vendor Lock-In | None | Common |
| Ideal Use Case | Lightweight, flexible integration | Full system replacement |
No Hidden Costs
No contracts, no monthly fees, no setup costs. Pay only for transactions you process.
Full Control
Your funds go directly to your account. Your data stays yours. Export and integrate anytime.
Flexible Integration
Lightweight integration that works with your existing systems. No need to replace everything.
Ready to Make the Switch?
Experience transparent pricing, full control, and flexible integration with DyerPay.